Article “Nguyễn An Phong” in Vietnamese Wikipedia has 7.4 points for quality (as of July 1, 2026). The article contains 2 references and 2 sections.
In June 2026 the article “Nguyễn An Phong” was edited by 1 authors in Vietnamese Wikipedia
Since the creation of article “Nguyễn An Phong”, its content was written by 3 registered users of Vietnamese Wikipedia.
The article is cited 7 times in Vietnamese Wikipedia.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2026 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #4013 02.2026 |
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #1091 02.2026 |
On 1 July 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2026 FIFA World Cup, Kylian Mbappé, Erling Haaland, Democratic Republic of the Congo, FIFA World Cup, Harry Kane, Romelu Lukaku, Senegal, Michael Olise, Sadio Mané.
In Vietnamese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Bảng xếp hạng bóng đá nam FIFA, Phanxicô Xaviê Trương Bửu Diệp, Đài Truyền hình Kỹ thuật số VTC, XNXX, Giải vô địch bóng đá thế giới 2026, Cộng hòa Dân chủ Congo, Đội tuyển bóng đá quốc gia Cộng hòa Dân chủ Congo, Da Lab, Kylian Mbappé, La Văn Cầu.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 50 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2026. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2026 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2026... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(5.21+1.12+0+10+20.79)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
